Added

• You can add and remove editors on the web. On a draft you created, the Participants section now has Add editor, which takes the person's user ID, and Remove on each editor, which asks before it removes them. If the person can't be added or removed, the reason is shown.

• An editor can step down on the web. An editor of a draft sees Step down on their own row in its Participants section. Stepping down also closes the draft to you, so you are taken back to the published version, or to the home page if there isn't one.

Changed

• An argument's buttons sit in a row under its title. The argument's menu, now three dots, comes first, then Review, Publish and Discard, each where it applies. Where there is room each shows its words; on a narrow screen they are round icons, and the first click shows the words while the second acts. Discard has moved out of the menu into this row, Review opens the sidebar's Review section, and Add premise is now at the foot of the premise list. On a draft with no premise yet, Publish is shown but refused, and says why.

• Reset is no longer offered on a draft. The menu on a draft you are editing no longer has Reset, which put the draft back to the version it was made from. Discard draft still deletes a draft's unpublished changes. After that, the published version stays readable and can be forked, but it can't be edited again.

• You can go straight to an answer your review settles both ways. When your answers and the steps you accepted settle a claim both ways, the results now put a Change your answer button under that claim, which takes you to its step, as the phone app does. Two claims that share a title are now listed separately, and a claim with no title is listed as "Untitled claim" instead of being left out. If a review's results cannot be worked out, your assignments and the check of every possible assignment are still there under View Details.

• Participants can be changed on the latest draft only. If the draft you have open is published while you are on it, adding or removing an editor, or stepping down, now says so and nothing is changed. The Add editor, Remove and Step down buttons then go away, and the message stays to say why.

• A claim is marked "Divided" only when readers really are split. The tag beside a claim's agree and disagree buttons used to appear as soon as two readers had reacted and at least as many disagreed as agreed, even when most of them disagreed, so it could contradict the summary under the claim. It now appears when enough readers have reacted and they are close to evenly split either way, the same rule as the summary.

• The results details' section headings are headings for screen readers. "Conclusion" and "Constraint Premises" in a review's details can now be reached by moving between headings.

• A cancelled import counts the steps that finished. If you cancel an import, the tokens its finished steps used count against this month's allowance; steps it had not finished don't.

• An import stopped by your token allowance can be retried after it resets. While this month's allowance is used up, Retry is unavailable and says the day it resets; after that, or once your plan allows more, Retry works again. If AI features pause while the page is open, Retry says so instead of failing with a general error.

Fixed

• Publishing a draft no longer changes who owns the argument. When an editor published someone else's draft, the new draft that publishing starts was made theirs: they became a second owner and could discard it, while the person who wrote the argument could no longer edit it or discard it on the phone. The new draft now belongs to the argument's creator, and everyone keeps the role they had, whoever publishes. An editor who had reached their limit of arguments can now publish a draft they were invited to, since it no longer counts as one of theirs. The upvote a newly published argument starts with is always its author's, even when an editor publishes it.

• A constraint premise is accepted or rejected, like every other premise. A premise that states a constraint rather than drawing a step used to offer Grant and Decline on the premise while the review's own step said Accept and Reject. It now says Accept and Reject everywhere: on the premise, in the list under View Details, in the results and in the alert that shows when your answers disagree with it. Rejecting a constraint still only sets it aside for your review; it does not say the constraint is false. How other readers decided a premise now reads "accept" and "reject" too.

• One "Change your answer" button per claim. When a claim appeared twice in a step your answers disagreed with, the review showed two identical "Change your answer" buttons for it. It now shows one.

• A review whose results cannot be worked out no longer keeps trying. The results step used to start the evaluation again the moment it failed, over and over, for as long as the step was open. It now tries once, says why it failed, and offers a Try again button.

• Back in a review goes to the step before. After choosing Edit on one of your answers in a review's results, Back used to take you to the results again instead of the step before the one you were editing. After reloading the page mid-review, Back was unavailable. Back now always goes to the previous step, and from the first premise step to the last claim step.

• A new username shows straight away. After you change your username in Profile Settings, the "Signed in as" line and the account menu now show the new name at once, instead of the old one until you reloaded the page.

• Making a premise the conclusion no longer erases its title. Choosing "Assign as conclusion" on a premise, on the web or in the phone app, cleared the name you had given it. The premise now keeps its title. A title that was lost this way before the fix has to be typed again.

• A passage can be linked to a part of an argument only once. Linking a passage of the source text that was already linked to the same claim or argument stored it a second time, and it was listed twice under "Linked passages". The link dialog now says the passage is already linked and keeps its link button off, and a repeat that gets through anyway is refused with the same message.

• Pages no longer scroll sideways on the narrowest phones when you're signed out. On the narrowest phone screens the bar across the top was slightly wider than the screen, so every page could be dragged sideways. It now fits.

• Search matches a renamed argument on its new title. When you renamed an argument, search kept matching it by meaning against the title you first gave it. It now uses the new title.

• Your blocked list no longer links to accounts that were deleted. Someone you blocked who later deleted their account is listed as "Deleted user" with no link to a profile that no longer exists. You can still unblock them.

• Stage names on the pipeline page no longer run into each other. When the page is too narrow to show every stage's name, the stages are drawn as a row of dots with the chosen stage named underneath, along with its number and status; tap a dot, or use the arrows either side, to move between stages. On a wider page the named stages stay, and the highlighted stage no longer covers the start of the next stage's name.

• An import stops when it uses up your monthly token allowance. An import that started with tokens to spare but ran out partway through used to keep going to the end. It now stops before its next step, and the import says it was stopped because this month's token allowance is used up.

• An import stops when AI features become temporarily unavailable. An import already running when AI features became temporarily unavailable kept going. It now stops before its next step and shows "Cancelled — AI temporarily unavailable".

• Two people editing the same claim no longer overwrite each other. When both saved, the later save could replace the earlier one without either person being told. Now the second save is refused, the claim editor says someone else changed the claim and shows their version, and your typed text stays in the editor so you can save again.

• Editors can change claims they did not write. Someone added to an argument as an editor could not save changes to a claim in a draft another participant had written; the save was refused. It now saves.

• Unpublished claims can be reused only by the person who wrote them. Only published claims, and your own drafts from arguments you still work on, can be added to an argument. Editing someone else's claim from one of your own arguments now gives you your own copy instead of changing theirs.

• Searching your claims finds them by their words again. Searching your claims, arguments, premises and sources, including under "Search existing claims" while you build an argument, could come back empty even when you had a published claim with exactly the words you typed. Anything whose text contains your search now appears, ahead of results that are only similar in meaning.