A claim's value chip no longer goes blank when the value was worked out for you. If a claim's true/false value came from the argument's own reasoning rather than from something you set, its chip on the argument view read Unknown even though the review itself had settled it. It now reads the value it actually has.

Reviews can now say a claim is Contested. When your own answers, run through the steps you accepted, make a claim true and false at the same time, the review says so instead of quietly reporting it as unsettled or as plainly false. Unknown means nobody settled it; Contested means you settled it twice, in opposite directions — so it is shown in red, with its own mark, wherever a value appears. Nothing about the argument's quality follows from it, and it is always yours to resolve: change one of the values you assigned, or withdraw one of the steps you accepted. The review results explain the new value in the same place they explain the others, with a plain-words definition, a worked example and further reading.